"Unlikely Events" Fallacies:

	Arthur S. Lodge \| home Evolution: Main Open Questions \| Scientific Theories of Evolution \| The Neo-Darwinian Theory: Version 2004 \| Darwinism: Scientific Theory, Research Program, or Faith? \| Crow & Swift: the Neo-Darwinian Theory Range of Applicablity \| Bio-logic \| The Devil in Neo-Darwinian Theory Details \| Industrial Melanism \| Mathematics of Evolution \| "Unlikely Events" Fallacies: \| Scientific Theory Testing \| Strong & Weak Falsifiability \| Censorship \| No Reply \| \| The Neo-Darwinian Theory Range of Applicability \| What is Natural Selection? \| Critics' Motivation \| Darwinism's Debit Sheet: 23 items \| Criticisms of "Finding Darwin's God" \| A criticism of "Gene Avatars: The Neo-Darwinian Theory of Evolution" \| Andrew Knoll: Life on a Young Planet \| Natural Selection \| --Type Title Here-- Fisher's Fallacies Shapiro's Shenanigans Dembski's Disaster Up Level (Evolution) Richard Dawkins: Designer! \|Huxley's "Hoary Objection" Howler
	"Unlikely Events" Fallacies: I disagree with the claim that highly improbable events are always happening. Fisher, Huxley, Shapiro, and Dembski have published fallacious arguments intended to show that highly improbable events often happen. Wald published a similar article which also contains a fallacious claim. Miller made a serious error in a discussion of evolution rates. Darwin published a fallacious eye complexity discussion. Dobzhansky, Ayala, Stebbins and Valentine published a fallacious Typing Monkeys argument.